Skip to content

menu

HomeAboutContact
Fox Rothschild LLP logo
Subscribe
Search
Close

Tax Controversy & Financial Crimes Report

Home » Blog » California District Court Finds Failure to File FBARs was Willful Despite Application for Voluntary Disclosure Program

California District Court Finds Failure to File FBARs was Willful Despite Application for Voluntary Disclosure Program

By Fox Rothschild LLP on February 21, 2017

The Bank Secrecy Act requires U.S. taxpayers to file FBARs with the U.S. Treasury disclosing any interest in, or signature authority over, foreign financial accounts with assets in excess of $10,000. If a U.S. taxpayer fails to file an FBAR, the IRS can assess a penalty of $10,000 per violation per year for up to six years. However, where a taxpayer willfully fails to file an FBAR, the IRS can assess a penalty of the greater of $100,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 50% of the balance in the unreported bank account for each year the taxpayer fails to file. A willful violation may also lead to criminal prosecution.

U.S. v. Bohanec

The Bohanecs owned a high-end camera store in California and, for years, had an accountant prepare their tax returns. The Bohanecs sold to customers around the world and brokered transactions between Leica Camera’s Canadian subsidiary and international buyers. The Bohanecs deposited the commissions from Leica and, on some occasions, the proceeds from their international sales, into an account with UBS in Switzerland.

The Bohanecs did not provide UBS with their U.S. address nor did they tell anyone other than their children about the existence of the Swiss account. The Bohanecs never discussed the Swiss account with their accountant, lawyer, or banker. The Bohanecs also opened other foreign bank accounts in Austria and Mexico. As of June 2008, they had nearly $650,000 in the UBS account and, for about a decade, they did not file any federal income tax returns or any FBARs.

In January 2010, the Bohanecs applied to participate in the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (“OVDP”). The OVDP permits U.S. taxpayers with unreported foreign accounts to avoid criminal charges and pay reduced civil penalties by making a voluntary disclosure to the IRS. In their application, the Bohanecs, under penalty perjury, misrepresented that all the funds in Swiss bank account were after-tax earnings from their camera business. The Bohanecs also failed to include their Austrian and Mexican accounts in their voluntary disclosure.

On December 8, 2016, a California District Court held that the Bohanecs’ failure to file FBARs was willful despite their application to participate in the OVDP. The Bohanecs argued that a willful violation only encompassed intentional violations but the District Court disagreed and concluded that willful conduct includes reckless conduct. The District Court cited the Supreme Court’s general understanding of willfulness as encompassing not only intentional violations but also reckless violations. The District Court also noted that recklessness is an objective standard that looks to whether conduct entails an unjustifiably high risk of harm that is either known or is so obvious that it should be known.

In finding the Bohanecs’ violation willful, the District Court considered their sophisticated business dealings. For a time they were the exclusive Leica Camera dealer in the world, they had a worldwide reputation and sold to customers around the world. Moreover, they were careful not to disclose the existence of their foreign bank accounts to anyone aside from their children. Based on these facts, the District Court concluded Bohanecs’ failure to file FBARs was willful exacerbated by their misrepresentations under penalty of perjury in their OVDP application.

The Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program

Taxpayers should be forthright and thorough in their voluntary disclosures. The OVDP provides taxpayers with the opportunity for reduced civil penalties and, more importantly, avoid criminal prosecution. The IRS and the courts will not look favorably on sophisticated taxpayers who try to skirt their FBAR obligations and are less than complete in the OVDP process.   Taxpayers should also keep in mind that their individual tax returns (Form 1040) asks whether they have an interest in, or signature authority over, foreign financial accounts. While not dispositive, answering dishonestly can be used as evidence of willfulness. Taxpayers should work with their attorneys to ensure their application to the OVDP is complete and ultimately accepted.

Posted in Cash Intensive Businesses, Civil Tax, Criminal Tax, Foreign Bank Account Reporting (FBAR)
Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Related Posts
23206674 - tax calculator with red button
23206674 - tax calculator with red button
Connecticut Announces Arrest of Restaurant Owner for Using “Zapper” Tax Suppression Software
July 31, 2017
Seal_of_the_Office_of_the_Comptroller_of_the_Currency_svg
FinCEN and OCC Impose $7 Million Penalty on California Bank for “Egregious” Anti-Money Laundering Violations
February 28, 2017
2000px-Seal_of_the_United_States_Department_of_Justice_svg
Feds Crack Down on Use of "Tax Zapper" Software by Restaurants and Other Cash Businesses
January 6, 2017

Subscribe & Connect

Subscribe by Email
Subscribe to this blog via RSS Subscribe to this blog via RSS
Follow Us on Twitter Follow Us on Twitter
View our LinkedIn Profile View our LinkedIn Profile

Tax Controversy & Financial Crimes Report

The Fox Legal Network
Fox Rothschild LLP logo
Subscribe to this blog via RSS Follow Us on Twitter View our LinkedIn Profile
Privacy NoticeTerms of Use

About Our Firm

Fox Rothschild LLP is a national law firm of 950 attorneys in offices throughout the United States. We’ve been serving clients for more than a century, and we’ve been climbing the ranks of the nation’s largest firms for many years, according to both The Am Law 100 and The National Law Journal.

Categories

Archives

Copyright © 2022, Fox Rothschild LLP. All Rights Reserved. Attorney Advertising.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. By continuing to browse our website you consent to our use of cookies as set forth in our Cookie Policy. Learn More

I Agree